The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Do Republicans Wear the Pants and Democrats Drop them? 

By Jim Kempton

Jim Kempton. File photo
Jim Kempton. File photo

The Republican Party has the long-standing reputation of being the fiscally tough, low tax, financially responsible party of reduced government. When it comes to spending, so the perception goes, the GOP wears the pants.

More than a few of the 20th century Democrats have had a reputation for being philanderers while in the Oval Office, chasing skirts instead of managing pocketbooks. How accurate are the perceptions? The historical record (darn those pesky facts) shows this conventional wisdom is at least half right.

Franklin Roosevelt had a longstanding love affair with a woman during his years as President, and several more were rumored. He also saw the U.S. triumph over the totalitarian forces of world domination and led America out of the Great Depression. A beloved figure, Roosevelt’s Social Security Act, GI Bill of Rights and faith in the common man helped the vast majority of ordinary Americans raise their living standard to never-before-seen levels.

John Kennedy had affairs outside his marriage, including one rumored with Marilyn Monroe. He also stared down the Soviet empire, preventing them from putting nuclear missiles in Cuba, cut taxes and revived the economy to robust expansion.

Richard Nixon explicitly ordered thugs to break into the opposition party’s headquarters and steal their campaign plans to cheat on elections. He had FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover make an “enemies list” of his opponents and illegally wiretap them. His administration created a serious recession, but there was certainly no cheating from this Quaker on his wife, Pat.

Ronald Reagan raised taxes seven times, negotiated with the Soviets and increased taxes on the poor. His administration presided over an enormous growth in government expenditures, a severe recession and led to record deficits that continued to rise astronomically. Although previously divorced, he was true blue to his wife, Nancy.

Bill Clinton used the oval office to carry on sex with one of his interns. He also significantly reduced the size of government for the first time in the 20th century, while reforming welfare and presiding over the largest and longest economic expansion in U.S. history. During Clinton’s eight years in office, the Reagan/Bush deficit was erased and a $400 billion dollar surplus was amassed.

George W. Bush’s administration took a $400 billion dollar surplus and, while nearly doubling the size of the government, returned to record deficit levels of nearly $400 billion again. That’s without adding the unbudgeted Iraq war expenditures expected to reach over a $1 trillion. He is not given credit for his courageous stand on immigration but W‘s marriage to lovely Laura was solid and strong.

So let the record show: Democrats indisputably have a hard time keeping their pants on. But when it comes to fiscal responsibility, building a strong economy and containing deficits, they wear the pants well, and seem to keep their nations wallet at least safe as the Republicans.

Although he enjoys American battlefield heroes far more than the politicians, Jim Kempton is student of American political history. As frustrating as they are, he will none-the less put any American Presidents up against the rest of the world’s leaders anytime.

In an effort to provide our readers with a wide variety of opinions from our community, the DP Times provides Guest Opinion opportunities in which selected columnists’ opinions are shared. The opinions expressed in these columns are entirely those of the columnist alone and do not reflect those of the DP Times or Picket Fence Media. If you would like to respond to this column, please email us at

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (3)

  • You almost made it, but by saying “and seem to keep their nations wallet at least safe as the Republicans” you injected another dose of false equilvalency. Clinton rescued us from Reagan/Bush, BushII destroyed what Clinton left him. Obama is rescuing us from BushII, the deficit is way down, and if Obama can put a little cash into the mix a huge pent up demand will emerge that will spell boom for a long time.

  • Don’t forget Eisenhower, he had a long-standing affair during the war and managed to make the presidency. Things were a “bit more private” back then.

    • It all revolves back to Eisenhower. Ike (I saw him on the caboose of a campaign New York Central train that stopped in my hometown in upstate New York) was the true Republican leader that forms the model for republican thought (now liberal thought). I was a republican in those days, as were all my contemporaries, and their parents. Our town was run by republicans, and we all remember their good works. Eisenhower was known for the things he believed in, high tax rates on the rich, strong unions, building national infrastructure, he would be a strong liberal these day. My republican friends and I enjoyed the fruits of his leadership for many years. Now all these friends are still strong republicans (those who still remain, few indeed), but they would have hated Eisenhower with passion, maybe even more than they hate President Obama. They have migrated from adoring with good cause a proven leader, a liberal republican who built this country with his ideas, to a series of midgets who lie and hate and cheat to beat down the opposition. They are bereft of ideas. “Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid”. Eisenhower from

      Stupid won.

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>