The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Straight Talk By Al Jacobs
Straight Talk By Al Jacobs

By Al Jacobs

The reformers are hard at work. One of the measures just approved by the California State Senate will raise the age for buying tobacco products to 21. There’s no denying that tobacco is a harmful substance, and it’s equally true that as persons age they’re less likely to begin the smoking habit. If these were the only factors, the rule might make sense, but as with most well-meaning but overbearing edicts, human nature is ignored.

Why a 16-year-old smokes can mostly be explained in sociological terms. As a two-pack-a-day teenage smoker, I still recall the need that my cigarette filled. It provided me with the confidence, sophistication and maturity that I otherwise lacked. It never concerned me that every package I purchased was in violation of some law. Likewise, no amount of lecturing or horror stories would have caused me to swear off. Only when my psyche no longer needed what my smokes provided, would I end the habit. Luckily, that time arrived. With a bit of revelation I came to terms with reality shortly after turning nineteen. I needed neither counseling nor a phasing out period. I quit cold turkey.

When it comes to abiding by oppressive regulations, I doubt young people today are much different than we were. Most certainly, increasing the age at which cigarettes may be purchased from 18 to 21 will not induce a 20-year-old addict to stop smoking. What it more likely will do is simply reinforce the anti-law-abiding attitude that more and more afflicts our society. It has been said, and rightly so, that the enactment of unenforceable laws do little more than increase the number of lawbreakers.

A final thought: I don’t fault our state legislators for enacting inane legislation. In most cases they’re merely responding to the demands of an inane constituency. This, of course, explains why the statute books are filled with the many senseless laws with which we’re plagued.

Al Jacobs, a professional investor for nearly a half-century, issues a monthly newsletter in which he shares his financial knowledge and experience. It may be viewed online at

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (1)

  • Inane laws indeed, here’s another example, although it is much more than an ‘inane law’. The war on drugs, especially those laws targeting marijuana has been a huge failure, under which millions of non-violent and otherwise law abiding citizens have gone to prison. That in itself has spawned the prison for profit crowd, adding further disruption of our society. Those who have paid the huge price for having violated this unjust and intrusive intervention into our society need to be pardoned, to be absolved of the damage done by these laws. And as for tobacco, it kills over 80,000 a year, and costs added by the medical damage done by smoking are huge. Yet somehow we can’t rid ourselves of this scourge, while we punish heavily for the non-damaging effects of marijuana.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>