SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
Community, Sustainability, Prosperity by Hoiyin Ip
Plastic: Politics or Priority?
Dana Pointers, you surprised me again. The 2018 Community Survey showed “there is room for growth in residents’ satisfaction with storm drain maintenance” as “maintaining storm drains to keep beaches clean” has been considered one of the top two important services by the city.
But do you know how generous the city is on this service? The 2017 report showed Dana Point spent $791,727. Putting it into perspectives, Laguna Beach spent $30,220, and Newport Beach spent $170,000. (The 2018 data was in a slightly different configuration, but the pattern across the cities was the same.)
What should be done is not to increase the service (i.e., cost) by the city, but to reduce trash by everyone, starting with single-use plastics. Some immediately think of a ban. Well, Dana Point has a track record of making ocean-friendly policies: plastic bag ban, Styrofoam ban, smoking ban. And “there is room for growth.” To-go utensils should be served on request. Plastic stirrers should be banned. Yes, we can do more.
Because most of the single-use plastics have compostable or biodegradable alternatives commonly available and affordable, plastic bans have been popping up locally and internationally—so frequently that I no longer think such news is new. But people keep “liking” and “sharing” it on social media. Does it say something about the public’s position on plastic policies?
Last September, then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed the straw on request bill to be effective on Jan. 1. Restaurants didn’t bother to wait. It’s a shame that Dana Point “missed the bus.” Last May, the Dana Point Ocean Water Quality Subcommittee decided to write a letter to support the straw bill. I asked why support someone with our words rather than action?
I believe city council could be on board for action:
- Councilmember Debra Lewis led the smoking ban effort. Okay, it’s been said that Lewis and Wyatt are the minority on the council, but not on all issues.
- Councilmember Rick Viczorek has demonstrated his action, quietly. Once in 2017, I told him he should not drink single-use plastic bottled water. Ever since then, I have seen him with a reusable bottle. Real change doesn’t happen unless one really wants to do it.
- Over a year ago, I talked to Councilmember Joe Muller about a plastic campaign. He introduced me to the Chamber of Commerce for help. The Chamber gets it. But this is a small office, with the biggest expectations set by the community. I don’t know how they keep their cool.
- Then there’s the new councilmember, Jamey Federico. When I spoke at the city council, his body language clearly showed he was on board. Okay, not solid proof. But my bottom line is it’s not politically correct to deny the need to reduce plastics.
So I believe that the city council’s lack of action is not because of politics, but a matter of priority.
Right now in Sacramento, at least three bills have been introduced to address plastic waste: SB-33, SB-54 and AB-1080. If 2018 taught us anything, we should come up with a policy now. It will be good (publicity) for Dana Point.