SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
LARRY WHITE, Dana Point
I have always understood a town hall to be an airing of facts and discussion where all sides of an issue can be heard in order to have a better informed citizenry.
With that in mind, to call the recent cannabis ballot measure presentation a “Town Hall,” as the Dana Point Times has done in two issues, is to unnecessarily elevate what was clearly a one-sided propaganda session to the level of something that it clearly was not.
Without at least two points of view in a presentation, there is no informed decision to be had, only a submission of the opinions of those presenting. Opinions which may or may not be based in fact, but one really has no way of knowing without the counter.
I appreciate Breeana Greenberg’s journalistic integrity by going outside of the so-called town hall to include facts that the “panel” did not. This “Town Hall” was not to fairly inform the public.
It was a forum on why and how to oppose the initiative, a one sided-propaganda session.