The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

DP logoToni Nelson, Capistrano Beach

The citizen referendum currently underway seeks to repeal the short-term vacation rental (STR) ordinance and bring this major change in residential zoning to a vote of the people. Public hearings nine years ago do not constitute adequate support to allow as little as two-day rentals, without restrictions or buffers, throughout the two-thirds of Dana Point not protected by CC&Rs. There have been no surveys of impacted neighbors and no comprehensive studies of the impacts of resident versus outside investor-owned STRs; the effects on long-term rental inventory; the impact on neighboring property values; nor the experiences of neighboring cities (most of whom have banned or restricted STRs). Most importantly, we need a full understanding of how and why illegal STRs are still operating and the extent to which the Coastal Commission will be allowed to regulate zoning in residential areas. Council can draft a stronger ordinance for short-term rentals that earns broad public support, or take the existing ordinance to the ballot box. Please sign the referendum and press “pause” before Dana Point as we know it is changed forever by three councilmen, two of whom leave office in December.

In response to Deanna Slocum’s Sept. 23 letter, here are the facts regarding the city’s notice to short-term rental permit holders. Noting that STR proponents seemed unusually organized, I emailed Code Enforcement Officer Ted Harris on Aug. 31 and Sept. 2 asking if he had sent them a special notice. Receiving no response, I filed a Public Records Request with the City Clerk on Sept. 2. On Sept. 9, I finally learned the letter was sent by Mr. Harris to all STR permit holders on Aug. 17 at 9:16 a.m. suggesting recipients “may wish to speak at the meeting or write a letter to City Council.” Apparently, Mr. Harris had been “inundated with calls” about the meeting date change between the close of the Aug. 16 Council meeting at 8:57 p.m. and 9:16 a.m. the next morning. No such personal notice was sent to known opponents to the ordinance. Copies of the entire email chain have been provided to the Dana Point Times.

To submit a letter to the editor, email

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (1)

  • The ordinance itself give people the ability to vote within their neighborhoods. Vocal people from Capo Beach paying signature gatherers in Ocean Ranch should not be telling us who can stay in our homes, when they can stay, and for how long.

    The ordinance itself allows each neighborhood to decide if they want to have vacation homes in their neighborhoods or not. HOA’s are allowed to prohibit them and any neighborhood that does not have an HOA or CC&R’s can form one to prohibit them.

    The city has been working on this for 9 years it’s been in place for 3. The ordinance give power to HOAs while protecting property rights. Don’t set the city back 9 years! The ordinance is working as the city manager said and that’s why the city voted to approve it.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>