The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Jody Payne, Dana Point

Are the citizens of Dana Point aware of the alternate plan for the proposed Doheny Hotel at the corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Dana Point Harbor Drive?

This version actually adds more hotel rooms—now up to 273 from 258. It would take 3/4 acre from Lantern Bay Park to create a driveway and parking for the hotel. The enclosed space would increase to 307,693 square feet, according to the city’s Environmental Impact Report.

The developer is telling us this is a concession, that he is concerned about public opinion and is therefore stepping back the five stories a bit to reduce the visual mass.

I’m sorry if I’m not impressed.

Five stories is still five stories, no matter how you stack it. Five stories is still more than double the height restriction of 35 feet in Dana Point. Please don’t be fooled into thinking this project is a one-time deal. Clearly, if this is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council, we have leaders who want to break rules, set monstrous precedents and turn our beach town into Marina Del Rey.

Many people who drive PCH every day have no idea that this hotel will have a loading zone right on the street. The Beverly Hills developer says they will add a southbound turning lane to alleviate congestion. What they really mean is they will create a loading zone lane just for them. It will cause intolerable congestion, unsafe lanes for bikes and block visibility at a very busy intersection.

Businesses put their loading docks at the back of the building. So it becomes very clear that the developer of the Doheny Hotel considers PCH to be its backside.

Why are we spending tons of money to turn our downtown into a pedestrian-friendly destination, only to make visitors and residents walk through an ugly loading zone? The developer has discussed adding another loading zone on the park side, but what will make them use it?

We all know this area is blighted right now and we all agree that appropriate development will improve the entrance to our city. We will live with this forever, so I implore our city to stick to the rules all the rest of us must follow.

This project is going to the Planning Commission on Monday, Feb. 10. Please attend. It will show our city leaders that we are paying attention to what they are doing and we vote accordingly.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (2)

  • Appears Jody Payne has down her homework, I applaud your efforts on the behalf of all the residents of Dana Point. Besides the various truths she brought to our attention I believe the most important point is this: Is the City going to follow it’s own rules and regulations or is it going to let this developer set a precedent that the City can be bought off? Again, thank you, Jody.

  • Traffic, Traffic, Dollars, and more traffic. There are 2 left turn lanes into the harbor from Northbound PCH. The driveway entrance to this proposed 5 story monster will be on Dana Harbor Drive pretty much where the existing little hotel’s entrance is.

    If a hotel guest is in the left most turn lane on PCH they will have to quickly cross through traffic to enter the hotel. When asked at a recent meeting about this potentially dangerous problem the answer was that the people will just make a U-turn at the Doheny Park entrance and then another U-turn at PCH. I suggest that guests unfamiliar with the area will feel the need to quickly dart through traffic which will certainly include hard to stop vehicles towing boats.

    Precedent setting height limits were already set terribly high when the County of Orange pushed through 55 foot tall buildings in the harbor. These limits were supported by the city so should we expect restraint now?

    Its all about money!

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>