The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Former Councilmember Debra Lewis

By Debra Lewis

Rancho Santa Margarita incorporated in 2000. As its first mayor, I served with four very conservative Republican councilmembers. Despite political differences, we were cooperative and respectful of one another’s opinions. Our decisions reflected consensus.

Elected with 65% of the vote in 2016, I envisioned a Dana Point council that understood residents’ desire for a beautiful coastal town, responsible development and friendly neighborhood appeal. Instead, I found a council steeped in partisan politics. Rather than seeking consensus, the majority repeatedly proved inflexible and unmovable, generally voting as a block, literally. The city now resembles Irvine, with more huge apartment projects coming. Residents anticipate another contentious battle to keep unsupervised, mini-hotels out of neighborhoods.

Last Tuesday’s Short-Term Rental council vote says it all. Despite professional survey results showing 60% of DP residents opposed to investor-owned STRs, Muller, Viczorek and Federico voted to expand STRs beyond the home-shares the Coastal Commission had proposed. Federico reneged on his campaign promise, joining Muller and Viczorek, voting against giving residents a vote on this major zoning change affecting their most valuable asset.

Unlike RSM’s unanimous agreement on a city manager, the DP council majority twice imposed their choice by 3-2 votes. Similarly, they refused to rebid the city attorney contract in effect since 2002, despite $1.7M in legal fees. And again this year, by 3-2, the majority approved the OCSD contract without meaningful review or comment. Our single largest expense that eats up every dollar of hotel bed tax deserves better.

No one is more cooperative and conciliatory than Paul Wyatt. Yet, the majority rewarded him by twice denying him the mayor honor. This year, the three gave Viczorek a second term as mayor rather than choose Wyatt. When Muller wanted an OC Parks Committee position, I withdrew my name in a cooperative gesture. After I reached out, Federico never answered my November 2019 text about working together on Neighborhood Watch.

I can now speak freely without being harassed with frivolous Public Record Act requests. Although I have sold my house, I will remain vocal on key issues, including the misogyny I experienced. I do not regret filing my complaint. I expected the “independent investigation” to find no basis—especially when, months later, the city informed me the Orange County Fire Authority had hired this “investigator” and might do so again in the future. Muller serves on OCFA and was president at the time. I refused to waive the conflict. The new “independent” investigator” used interviews and notes of the conflicted investigator, rather than starting fresh.

I sincerely thank many supporters. We tried unsuccessfully to pass 1) a private view ordinance preserving overgrown landscape from obscuring or eliminating residents’ views; 2) voter approval of an STR ordinance; 3) a Costa Mesa-type sober living home ordinance effectively regulating group homes; and 4) to oppose districting as Mission Viejo did in 2018. In 2020, Mission Viejo’s residents can still elect their council at large but did not spend “millions” fighting districting. I am pleased my “No Smoking” ordinance passed and user fees finally increased after 20 years, over Muller’s and Viczorek’s “No” votes. Residents will no longer subsidize developers, whose projects account for the bulk of city’s user fees.

My wish for Dana Point is that you find a three-person majority of honest, hard-working representatives who will represent your values and support your right to vote and hold them accountable. I hope citizens elect candidates supported by residents—not by nameless, faceless PACs, out-of-town investors and real estate interests.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (4)

  • LTR – Do you really think the best you can do with your time today is pass an egregious insult to someone who has served the community as Debra Lewis has? Kindness and graciousness are worthwhile values in our city. Your comments dont line up with those values.

  • No real news here
    Mrs Lewis rarely seemed happy in Dana Point over the last couple of years .We can only hope her endless complaint’s evaporate soon.
    Personally I did support her investigation into sexism on the board but when the complaint was investigated and dismissed I was sad to see she wouldn’t let it go . as a resident of Dana point ( yes Mrs Lewis I am unlike you a resident ) I look forward to a board that trusts each other and can work together to create a town we can all be proud of . I hope Mrs Lee is finds happiness in the liberal limousine land that’s known as the south bay and I will remind her that in our upcoming elections if we want to know what Mike Levin supported liberal democrats think , we will ask them directly .

  • Deborah Lewis served our city honorably and with great dedication. That she was stymied by a trio of councilman beholden to developers and STR interests is not her fault. She should be credited for calling out the old boy network which serves only itself and its puppeteers and not the interests of the citizens Nor should she be criticized for leaving the City for personal reasons just three plus months before her term ends. The Council did not deem it necessary to appoint an interim Council person.

    Good luck and Godspeed to Deborah.

  • Thank you for your service, Ms. Lewis. It was always clear to me that you cared about Dana Point and only wanted what was in the best interests of the majority of the residents.
    The insulting comments from others here are alternately absurd (“career politician”, seriously?), and just undignified. For shame.

comments (4)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>