The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Mayor Debra Lewis

Last week, two decisions positively impacted Dana Point policing. First, City Council approved a Notice of Completion for the nearly $1,000,000 police services renovation project approved in 2016 (Project).  Now all members of our police force will start their shifts here in Dana Point rather than at the Aliso Viejo substation. This renovation eliminated down time police had to spend traveling between Aliso Viejo and Dana Point. Instead, that time will now be spent policing Dana Point. The Project’s time savings approximates an extra 2,562 productive hours of sworn personnel time or the equivalent of two full-time deputies plus one half-time parking control officer.

Second, Chief Chilton was given everything he requested. Although it came with a 5.3 percent increase in cost over last year, the Orange County Sheriff Department (OCSD) contract was approved with no changes.

For fiscal year 2018, the OCSD contract will cost Dana Point a little over $12 million, which is almost exactly what Dana Point is projected to earn from our largest revenue source, Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), for the same period. There could be some additional charges such as pension funding changes, overtime charges in excess of contract estimates, changes in OCSD personnel salaries and benefits or any enhanced law enforcement services and equipment provided for Dana Point community events.

Dana Point agrees to pay the $343 per capita, or approximately $100-200 per capita over all other OCSD contract cities to get OCSD’s Premium Service. Dana Point’s policing model, particularly its Crime Suppression Unit, is considered the best practice for those communities that can afford it.

According to the newly approved contract, 41 law enforcement professionals, each working 80 hours per two-week pay period, will be dedicated to policing Dana Point’s 6.6 square miles: Lt.  Chilton, our Chief of Police, one Administrative Sergeant, five Patrol Sergeants, two Investigators, one Investigative Assistant, 20 Deputy Sheriffs II – Patrol/Traffic, one Deputy Sheriff II – Motor Traffic, one Crime Prevision Specialist, five Community Services Officers – Parking Control, three Deputy Sheriffs II – Community Support, one Deputy Sheriff II – Directed Enforcement and extra help as needed.

According to the contract, Dana Point will also share the services of the following OCSD Regional/Shared Team: approximately eight Traffic personnel, four Auto Theft personnel, two Detectives, one Office Specialist – Subpoena, two Investigative Assistants – Courts and one Motorcycle Supervision Sergeant for a total of 17.90 additional police personnel along with helicopter services.

Thank you to our dedicated police force.  We appreciate your service. Residents look forward to:

  • Significant reduction in property crime
  • Significant increase in enforcement of speed limits and traffic laws
  • An active partnership with an effective Homeless Task Force
  • Enhanced public visibility on our streets and in our neighborhoods
  • A robust, effective city-wide Neighborhood Watch Program

The District Attorney advised that a visible police presence and a strong neighborhood watch are two of the most effective tools in the city’s arsenal to reduce crime.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (1)

  • How can you write this when you voted against it? What are your real motives? And, same with your buddy, the Mayor Pro Tem, He made a motion to disapprove and then voted against his own motion to look good (so it wouldn’t be so obvious that both of you voted against the re-upping of the police contract) We need honesty not politics. Be honest’ please.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>