SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
By Andrea Papagianis
Federal regulators will receive information Monday about storing used nuclear fuel and the possibility of expediting the process of transferring nuclear waste from cooling pools to dry storage.
Members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hear a brief on the safety of storing nuclear waste in cooling pools January 6 at the agency’s Maryland headquarters.
The safety of spent nuclear fuel in pools at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, situated 12 miles south of Dana Point, has been a topic of debate since majority plant owner Southern California Edison’s June decision to close the plant permanently. San Onofre stopped energy production in January 2012 after a small radiation leak and abnormal wear in the plant’s two reactors was found.
Safety concerns prompted the San Clemente City Council’s recent decision to ask federal regulators to remove nuclear waste from the site. But currently, with no federal repository for such waste, San Onofre’s nuclear fuel could be stored at the location indefinitely.
The federal hearing will look at accelerating the moving of fuel from cooling pools to dry cask storage units, which are considered less vulnerable to environmental disasters.