The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the DP Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Featured Image: The Capistrano Unified School District will look at whether it should place another bond measure on an upcoming ballot to fund needed upgrades at Dana Hills High School. Photo: File/Lillian Boyd

By Collin Breaux

The Capistrano Unified School District is looking at whether to place a bond on a future ballot to fund needed upgrades to Dana Hills High School, as well as to determine if a majority of voters would even be in favor of such a measure.

The CUSD Board of Trustees approved a resolution to consider and research a potential bond measure for the school’s facilities during a meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 15. The resolution does not mean the bond will automatically be placed on a future ballot for now; it is merely so the district can move forward on studying the feasibility of a bond.

An agenda report said Dana Hills High is “almost 50 years old” and based on a state assessment requiring “seismic retrofitting”—which involves enhancing current structures to protect them more against earthquakes and other ground activity—likely “will need to be almost entirely replaced to meet existing seismic safety requirements that would be required to be implemented as part of a whole-campus modernization.”

Estimated costs to investigate the potential bond measure are more than $140,000 for a facilities master plan; $75,000 for community engagement; $50,000 for public opinion research; $20,000 for financial services; and $20,000 for legal services. The cost for the facilities master plan is expected to be reimbursed from bond proceeds, while the rest would be covered by the district’s general fund.

The cost to modernize Dana Hills High is currently projected at $200 million, which includes replacing portable classrooms with permanent construction.

The agenda report further said it is estimated that funding sources may include financing from the South Bus Yard lease revenue at approximately $40 million; state funding in the amount of approximately $80 million; and a local bond measure for approximately $80 million.

“Funding may need to be increased with construction cost inflation over time,” the report said.

The board voted, 4-3, to approve the resolution as recommended by district staff. Trustees Martha McNicholas, Amy Hanacek, Krista Castellanos, and Pamela Braunstein voted yes. Trustees Gila Jones, Judy Bullockus and Lisa Davis voted no.

Jones raised concerns about moving forward with other parts of the investigation without first gauging public opinion and seeing if a majority of voters would even be in favor of a bond. The district is also considering a potential bond for schools in Aliso Viejo, with similar research steps beforehand.

“Here’s my issue: we need to do this polling, the public opinion research, to see if these things will fly,” Jones said. “We can’t move forward until we know what the polling says. If the polling on one of these comes back and says only 40% of voters say they’ll vote for this, well, the fact that we’ve spent $145,000 or $149,000 each on a facility masters plan is not fiscally responsible. We have to poll first.”

McNicholas said a facilities master plan is required for seismic retrofitting, regardless of whether or not a bond measure goes forward.

“In order to get to a point where we can poll somebody, I think we need to do some of the other stuff, too—the community engagement,” McNicholas said. “I think we have to do all of this in order to do any of it.”

CUSD spokesperson Ryan Burris said he believes the district has done community engagement after public polling when questioned by Jones, but it has also done community engagement while putting together polling.

“In some cases, we do engagement first, so we can see what the numbers are and how much more engagement we need to do after that in order to make the numbers better,” Burris said.

Jones said that approach hasn’t been “terribly effective” before. Voters previously did not approve bond measures placed on ballots in March 2020 and November 2016 that would have funded school facility renovations.

Some community members spoke in favor of bond measures moving forward. Melina Pellini, president for the Dana Hills High School Parent Teacher Student Association, said a new facility will be a “beacon for thousands of students who deserve a safe environment to learn and grow.”

“A targeted bond specific to Dana Hills in Dana Point and part of Laguna Niguel can make this happen,” Pellini said. “Even though my time at Dana will end this year, I would like nothing better than to drive by a new high school at the heart of our community, and know that our children are benefiting directly from our tax dollars and we are taking full advantage in all the funding the state has to offer.”

If the process on the bond measure moves forward, the bond election could happen in November 2022 or at a later time.

Collin Breaux

Collin Breaux covers San Juan Capistrano and other South Orange County news as the City Editor for The Capistrano Dispatch. Before moving to California, he covered Hurricane Michael, politics and education in Panama City, Florida. He can be reached by email at                         

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (0)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>