Shawn Raymundo and Lillian Boyd, Dana Point Times

The City of San Clemente hosted a town hall forum on Wednesday, Nov. 13, to discuss traffic relief in South Orange County. The panel of participants included representatives from California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), as well as local elected state officials Sen. Patricia Bates and Assemblymember Bill Brough.

At a Toll Road Town Hall meeting the city hosted at the community center on Wednesday, Nov. 13, Assemblymember Bill Brough presents his reasoning for introducing state legislation that would vastly restrict the planning authority of the Transportation Corridor Agencies, which has proposed extending the 241 Toll Road through San Clemente in order to connect to the I-5 Freeway. Photo: Shawn Raymundo

The initial stages of the environmental process to study the proposed 241 Toll Road extensions through San Clemente and parts of San Juan Capistrano are officially underway, as Caltrans last week began to accept public comment and review of the South County Traffic Relief Effort.

“The purpose of this town hall is to provide information. The Toll Road is a community issue that is paramount,” said San Clemente Mayor Pro Tem Dan Bane, who moderated the panel. “As a council, we’ve been working on a lot of issues. . . . We want to let you know where we’re at in the process.”

Brad Malamud, of San Clemente, speaks in opposition to the alternatives that would go through San Clemente. Photo: Shawn Raymundo

 On Friday, Nov. 8, Caltrans, in coordination with the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (F/ETCA)—part of the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)—submitted the Notice of Preparation/Notice of Intent and announced a pair of public scoping meetings for Nov. 20 and Dec. 4.

The Relief Effort, which includes a series of proposed routes—one is extending the 241 through San Clemente and connecting to the I-5 Freeway; another is extending Crown Valley Parkway to the 241—are intended to “improve north-south regional mobility in South Orange County and accommodate regional travel demand,” according to Caltrans.

At the community center on Wednesday, Nov. 13, acting San Clemente Mayor Dan Bane moderates the city’s Toll Road Town Hall forum, which included a panel of local transportation officials, as well as state Sen. Patricia Bates and Assemblymember Bill Brough. Photo: Shawn Raymundo

Initially there was a total of 24 overall ideas for the project, but those have been narrowed-down to 11 alternative proposals—including a no-build option—all of which will eventually go through environmental and engineering studies.

The proposed options that could potentially impact San Clemente and San Juan include alternatives 13, 14, 17, 21, 22 and 23.

Alternative 13 would have the 241 extension come down through San Juan and cut west to connect to the I-5.

Alternative 17 would similarly have the 241 travel down through San Juan and continue south into San Clemente, connecting to the I-5 through Shorecliffs.

Alternative 14 is proposed to extend down near the western border of Rancho Mission Viejo, cross over La Pata and join the freeway by Avenida Pico.

Alternative 21 is comprises two separate roadway segments, with the first one extending Los Patrones Parkway from Cow Camp Road to Avenida La Pata. “The second segment would provide a median-to-median, high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane connector from SR 73 to I-5,” according to Relief Effort.

Alternative 22, a road alignment plan that Orange County Board Supervisor and Chairperson Lisa Bartlett has proposed, would connect the new Los Patrones Parkway from Cow Camp Road to Avenida La Pata, running along the east side of the Prima Deschecha Landfill.

Alternative 23, which has a few potential components to it, would extend the managed lanes—High Occupancy Toll lanes and High Occupancy Vehicle lanes—on the I-5, from Pico to the Basilone Road interchange.

“Is there any possibility some of these ideas are just too stupid to consider studying?” Bane asked.

Mike Chesney, TCA Strategic Officer, said that because the agencies were in the formal CEQA process, options could not be removed and that each alternative would still need to be studied.

In closing remarks, Sen. Bates said it didn’t make sense that alternatives were added to the study process but that alternatives could not be removed.

A concern that OCTA has expressed are potential conflicts the alternative routes have with Measure M-funded projects.

In February 2018, OCTA initiated a project to build six new miles of carpool lanes between San Juan Creek Road and Avenida Pico on I-5. Alternatives 11 and 12 would convert Measure M-funded carpool lanes—Avenida Pico to San Juan Creek Road—to HOT lanes.

TCA states the agency is keenly aware of the recently completed and ongoing Measure M projects along I-5 in South Orange County and respects OCTA’s Measure M commitments.

“Given the planning year horizon of 2050 and the regional nature of the project, we believe it is important to consider alternatives on the I-5, as well as alternatives which provide an extension of the SR-241,” the TCA has said in a previous statement.

The public scoping period was initially set for Nov. 8 through Dec. 9. Bane urged Caltrans and the TCA to extend the 30-day scoping period to 90 days, considering the holiday season could deter input. Based on input received, TCA and Caltrans have agreed to extend the comment period for a total comment period of 60 days, according to a Sarah King, a spokesperson for TCA.

“The scoping period kicks off the formal environmental review phase of the SCTRE, which will consider traffic data, community issues and environmental impacts of every alternative that advances to the technical studies portion of the PA/ED phase of the process,” according to a statement that followed the town hall event.

Members of the public can submit comments to Caltrans via email at scoping@sctre.org or in person at one of two public meetings: on Nov. 20 at the Norman P. Murray Community Center in Mission Viejo and on Dec. 4 at the Ocean Institute. Comments can also be mailed directly to Caltrans. Both public scoping meetings are in an open house format and will run from 5-8 p.m.

Information about the SCTRE, including a map of the proposed alternatives, the preliminary scoping report, an overview video and Caltrans’ mailing address, is available at www.sctre.org.

SR_1Shawn Raymundo
Shawn Raymundo is the city editor for the San Clemente Times. He graduated from Arizona State University with a bachelor’s degree in Global Studies. Before joining Picket Fence Media, he worked as the government accountability reporter for the Pacific Daily News in the U.S. territory of Guam. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnzyTsunami and follow San Clemente Times @SCTimesNews.

 

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is LB_1.jpg

Lillian Boyd
Lillian Boyd is the senior editor for Picket Fence Media and city editor for Dana Point Times. She graduated with a degree in journalism from Humboldt State University. Her work experience includes interviewing incarcerated individuals in the Los Angeles County jails, an internship at the Pentagon covering U.S. Army news as well as reporting and anchoring for a local news radio station in Virginia. Follow her on Twitter @Lillianmboyd and follow Dana Point Times at @danapointtimes.

About The Author Dana Point Times

comments (0)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>